Mon - Fri 08.30 - 18.00
Second Floor Goldsmith Building Temple London EC4Y 7BL
Tel: +44 020 7936 3637
Fax: +44 020 7583 2061
DX 458 London Chancery Lane
Chambers provides an out of hours service. If you call Chambers main number you will be diverted to the clerk on call who will be able to deal with your enquiry.
The Government’s announcement in June that it is to bring forward legislation in Parliament to ratify the Hague Convention on the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict (otherwise known as the “Hague Convention”) marks an important step in the fight against ISIL and in curbing the flow of a significant source of its funding.
The Hague Convention is an international treaty which was signed on 14 May 1954 which requires its signatories to protect cultural property in the context of war. The Convention was adopted by UNESCO in the aftermath of the Second World War which had witnessed the wide-scale destruction and systematic removal of priceless cultural artefacts by the Nazis from Eastern Europe and North Africa. Today, over 115 countries have ratified the Convention including the United States which signed in 2009.
By providing exclusively for the protection of cultural heritage at risk from armed conflict, the Hague Convention was the first such treaty of its kind. Most notably, the Convention also gave birth to the principle of common heritage which is a tenet of international law which holds that defined territorial areas and elements of humanity’s common heritage (cultural and national) should be held in trust for future generations and be protected from exploitation by individual nation states.
The preamble and first Article (which provides a workable definition of “cultural property”) of the Convention are worthy of note. The text of the preamble is framed in particularly poignant terms and is designed to be a salutary reminder of the atrocities of the Second World War from which the Convention emerged. In no uncertain terms, the Convention begins:
“The High Contracting Parties: Recognizing that cultural property has suffered grave damage during recent armed conflicts and that, by reason of the developments in the technique of warfare, it is in increasing danger of destruction; Being convinced that damage to cultural property belonging to any people whatsoever means damage to the cultural heritage of all mankind, since each people makes its contribution to the culture of the world; Considering that the preservation of the cultural heritage is of great importance for all peoples of the world and that it is important that this heritage should receive international protection..”
The definition of “cultural property” under Article 1(1) is comprehensive and far-reaching covering, amongst other things, monuments of architecture, art or history, works of art, buildings, museums, libraries, manuscripts, books and other objects of artistic, historical or archeological interest. The abiding qualification is that the work must be “great importance to the cultural heritage of every people”. The Article is also careful to point out that it does not distinguish works on the grounds of religious or secular significance.
The full extent of damage to sites in the Middle East occupied by ISIL may not be clear for some time, but reports in recent months from Iraq point to the destruction of artefacts in the Mosul Museum and the bulldozing and looting of the historic sites of Nimrud and Hatra. More recent unverified reports suggest that ISIL has planted mines in the ancient Syrian city of Palmyra threating destruction on unprecedented levels. What is clear, however, is that all these sites and artefacts fall squarely within the parameters imagined by the authors of the Convention.
A Second Protocol to the Convention adopted in 1999 created conditions under which criminal responsibility shall apply to the individual for serious violations with respect to the cultural property. The Second Protocol also elaborated on the provisions of the Convention relating to the safeguards and protections of cultural property, creating a further, higher level of protection to be adhered to by state parties.
The aims and objectives of the Convention are pursued by its signatories under the auspices of UNESCO, a specialised agency of the United Nations whose purpose is to contribute to peace and security by promoting international collaboration through education, science and culture. With the trade of looted cultural artefacts from historical sites and museums in Iraq and Syria, the work of UNESCO has assumed a vital imperative in the fight against terrorism financing and the Hague Convention alone does not fully address the emerging crisis in this region.
Owing to its inherent vulnerability and symbolic value, cultural heritage is at particular risk in times of armed conflict not only in terms of potential destruction but also in terms of trafficking – a problem not dealt with by the Hague Convention. Under the Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property (known as the “1970 Convention”), states are required to take action to monitor trade in cultural property, impose sanctions where required and to recover and return any cultural property imported illegally.
In fact, the 1970 Convention plays a pivotal role in UNESCO’s work in preventing the looting of artefacts which have fallen under the control of ISIL. In May, UNESCO took steps to further bolster the 1970 Convention by publishing key operational guidelines for state parties to follow, by promoting the use of detailed inventories and by issuing model export certificates. Tracing looted artefacts is a complex task and these provisions may be able to offer a significant tool in curbing ISIL’s funding and help prevent priceless works of art from being removed from historical sites and museums. In recent months, UNESCO has received reports that numerous archeological sites have been systematically excavated by well-organised and often armed groups, reminiscent of Nazi activities in Egypt in the 1940s. It is feared that many pieces may have already made their way to London, New York or China where they may have been traded with private collections or unscrupulous dealers.
Ratifying the Hague Convention is likely to be a welcome move by the U.K. Government but it remains to be seen whether it also intends to ratify the 1970 Convention, arguably the vanguard of UNESCO’s efforts to prevent the illegal trade in priceless cultural property and a valuable instrument in tackling ISIL’s access to funding.
Over the past week, Lewis Power QC has been representing the Church Court International Law Team across the pond. Mr. Power QC... more
Lincoln’s Inn Barrister Still Missing Despite the Promises of Foreign Adviser Gowher Rizvi to Assist after Al Jazeera Head to... more
Yasin Patel and Amy Hazlewood look at one of the most important pieces of legislation passed in recent years. One that is looking... more
As October 31st 2019 draws nearer, Britain’s exit from the European Union and its exact terms become all the more important. ... more
The Corporate Manslaughter and Homicide Act 2007 (the Act), was designed to create a statutory offence, facilitating the... more
Yasin Patel and Amy Hazlewood look at the area of drill music and the law. This article is split into two parts: the first part... more
Yasin Patel looks at the question of “racism in football”. In this two part series, the first article outlines the arguments... more
In this article, written by Yasin Patel and Amy Hazlewood, we look at the areas of drugs, and in particular ‘county lines’... more
The British government and its agencies powers of investigation will increase significantly with a new piece of legislation.... more
Since the downfall of ISIS and the liberation of many Syrian people, women and children (and whole families) have been fleeing to... more
Tax Avoidance and Tax Evasion. What is the difference? One is illegal and one is smart tax planning. But which is which? Local... more
Yasin Patel and Amy Hazlewood explore the problems surrounding drones, from their use in humanitarian activities to drugs being... more
Yasin Patel looks at the growing area of ‘Image Rights’ and why it makes sense for a sports star to protect their ‘image... more
The case of Zamira Hajiyeva and the Unexplained Wealth Order “UWO” restrictions imposed upon her have brought to... more
New Law Journal publishes article by George Hepburne Scott regarding the recent ground breaking High Court case regarding prison... more
New Law Journal publishes an article by George Hepburne Scott regarding changes to the judiciary in Poland. George Hepburne Scott... more
‘Suck my d**k, you n****r, you n***o’ Offended by the title. And so you should be, but what are you going to do about it?... more
Please follow link below to read George Hepburne Scotts article on extradition published in the New Law Journal.... more
The Situation before the Human Rights Act In the traditional doctrine of statutory interpretation, the courts looked at the... more
The new Prime Minister Theresa May has announced a review of the Modern Slavery Act 2015; it is clear that corporate compliance... more
The Court of Appeal in the case of Griffiths 1 QB 589, made an apposite observation concerning a growing trend towards indicting... more
On 23 June 2016 over 33 million people voted in the EU referendum. Since that date there has been widespread anger from those who... more
Alkan Shenyuz is a barrister with Church Court Chambers specialising in international commercial law and in this article for... more
Leading legal publisher Westlaw has published Michael Polak’s article on INTERPOL notices. INTERPOL notices can severely... more
Alkan Shenyuz, a barrister and specialist in banking and financial services looks at the new EU Payment Services Directive and... more
In a clear sign that regulators want to open up competition in the UK banking industry to new banks, the Prudential Regulatory... more
In R (on the application of DC and The Secretary of State for Justice EWHC 33 (Admin) the High Court considered the law of... more
Whilst it would be naïve to suggest that ‘marriages of convenience’ do not occur, the Home Office seem to me to be using... more
Anthony assisted partners in Peters & Peters LLP in providing an expert summary of the laws and regulations which have been... more
Looted antiquities from Syria – what collectors need to know Alkan Shenyuz, barrister with Church Court Chambers discusses what... more
Modern Slavery Act 2015 The introduction of this consolidating act is to be welcomed. As with all recent changes to criminal... more
Alkan Shenyuz, a barrister with Church Court Chambers in London and a specialist in international law, summarises the key legal... more
The Government’s announcement in June that it is to bring forward legislation in Parliament to ratify the Hague Convention on... more
An interesting and insightful article from Lesley Manley of Church Court Chambers on mental impaired clients. It is often helpful... more