Benjamin Aina KC
picture_as_pdf Year of Call:
1987
|
Year of Silk:
2009
Notable Cases
R v. C Prosecuting Queens Counsel
Man kills wife due to lesbian affair. Loss of control defence. Defendant convicted.
R v. PC Prosecuting Queens Counsel
Man pushes former Eurotunnel boss onto train tracks. Attempted murder. Defendant convicted.
R v. L & M: Prosecuting Queens Counsel
Gangs steal free evening standard newspapers for profit. Instructed to give detailed advice on the law of theft. Both defendants convicted following trial.
R v AJ Defence Queen’s Counsel
Seven-handed murder. Obtaining successful acquittal on charge of murder. Manslaughter alternative verdict.
R v. HA Defence Queens Counsel
Four handed gang related murder at the Old Bailey. Successful acquittal.
R v BP Defence Queen’s Counsel
Two-handed murder. Obtaining successful acquittal on charge of murder of a 15-year-old. Manslaughter alternative verdict.
R v Cr Defence Queen’ Counsel
Acquittal of husband and wife (separately represented) on allegation of shooting and using a knife against family members inside and outside their home on Easter Sunday. Both accused successfully raising pleas of self defence.
R v Cu Defence Queen’s Counsel
Defending in four-handed murder. Victim attacked with various weapons and having been killed attempts had been made to dismember his body with an angle grinder. Accused acquitted of murder convicted of manslaughter but all other defendants convicted of murder.
R v A Defence Queen’s Counsel
Four-handed murder charge in context of drug-related offences. Allegations of torture. 16-year-old vulnerable defendant.
R v N Defence Queen’s Counsel
27 day three-handed murder and attempted murder, defending vulnerable 16-year-old defendant; victims also 16. Case involved the aftermath of an acid attack. Defences considered were diminished responsibility, legal loss of control, lack of intent and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), alternatively an adjustment disorder. D acquitted of murder but manslaughter by diminished responsibility.
R v D Prosecuting Queen’s Counsel
Death caused by driving when under influence of alcohol/drugs. Obtained successful conviction following 7-day trial for manslaughter.
R v B Prosecution Queen’s Counsel with junior and disclosure counsel
Five-handed murder, attempted murder possession of firearms and section 18 assaults. All parties both accused and victims were members of gangs in the Birmingham area.
R v F K Prosecution Queen’s Counsel
Five-handed attempted murder/conspiracy to cause grievous bodily harm involving serious allegations that police evidence had been planted and raising issues of when a judge should recuse himself in an ongoing case.
R v. AJ [2018]: Defence Queen’s Counsel
AG Ref. on sentence in Murder/manslaughter case. Sentence was not increased.
R v PW [2016] 2 Cr.App R 27, Prosecuting Queen’s Counsel
The applicable mens rea in indecent images, abuse of process principles; the Tryell principle, preferring indictments on electronic system; jurisdiction of the Court of Appeal in Terminating appeals.
R v JM [2015] EWCA Crim 1928 Prosecuting Queen’s Counsel
Issues arising relating to abuse of process; missing documents; terminating rules in the context of historic allegations of sexual abuse.
R v Sliogeris [2015] EWCA Crim 22 Prosecuting Queen’s Counsel
The correct approach to circumstantial evidence in murder cases.
R v. Stanton [2014] EWCA Crim 1695 Prosecuting Queen’s Counsel
The correct approach to bad character hearsay evidence where cut-throat defences are being run in murder cases.
Ulcay [2008] 1CR.App.R.27
Ambit and scope of cab rank principle in complex fraud cases.
Wallace [2007] 2 Cr App R 30 a
Application of bad character provisions in circumstantial evidence cases.
Malcolm v DPP [2007] 2 Cr App R Prosecuting Counsel
Admissibility of new evidence after justices have retired.
Abiodum [2005] EWCA Crim 09
Criteria to be applied before lawful intercepts can take place in prison.
De Silva (2003) 2 Cr..App.R. 40
Ambit of customs co-operation interviews.
Ex parte Salubi (2002) 2 Cr.App.R.40
Abuse of process in section 51 transfer cases.
Ofori & Tackie (No 2) (1994) 99 Cr.App.R. 223
Admissibility of foreign evidence in English Courts.
Okafor (1994) 99 Cr.App.R.97
Applicability of code C.10-12 in customs cases.
