Mon - Fri 08.30 - 18.00
Second Floor Goldsmith Building Temple London EC4Y 7BL
Tel: +44 020 7936 3637
Fax: +44 020 7583 2061
DX 458 London Chancery Lane
Chambers provides an out of hours service. If you call Chambers main number you will be diverted to the clerk on call who will be able to deal with your enquiry.
Mr Newcombe’s client had pleaded guilty to murder on a Basis of Plea. The Crown disputed the Basis. A Newton hearing was held in order that the judge determine the factual basis for sentence.
The Crown case was that this was a murder for gain and that the correct starting point for the mandatory life sentence was 30 years.
The defence case was that the correct starting point for the mandatory life sentence was 15 years.
The main issue was whether the sentencing judge could be sure that the deceased was murdered for financial gain. The defendant had used the deceased’s bank card to gain access to his account after killing him in a ferocious attack. The two men had been in each other’s company during the day of his death when cheques were paid into the deceased’s bank account.
The defence case was that this was a tragic drunken overreaction to a minor slight which lead to the killing. The use of the deceased’s bank card was an afterthought.
A two day hearing was held at the Central Criminal Court. The learned judge heard evidence from prosecution witnesses, agreed pathology and neuropathology evidence, blood spatter and other forensic evidence. Other agreed evidence from CCTV stills showed the defendant using the bank card apparently with the deceased’s permission in shops and at an ATM prior to his death.
The learned judge also heard evidence from the defendant, and then defence submissions by Mr Newcombe.
In a detailed judgment the learned judge ruled that he could not be sure that the murder was done for gain. He made a finding that an aggravating feature of the case was that the defendant had concealed the body in bushes. This had been disputed.
The correct starting point for sentence was therefore 15 years as per the defence submissions. This was increased by 6 years to take full account of the aggravating features (including the ferocity of the attack, the vulnerability of the defendant at the time and the concealment of the body).
The learned judge then applied the full discount allowable in cases of murder for the guilty plea (one sixth or 5 years whichever is the less). The sentence of the court was therefore Life Imprisonment with a minimum term of 17 and-a-half years (less days spent on remand).
In 2017 the Competition & Markets Authority (“CMA”) found that Ping, a manufacturer of golf clubs, had infringed the... more
jkjhfgr eruighuihsgy8 sduihgsuhgouher eihgseui9gjsgp sdioughseiougnois... more
Pamela Brain secured the only acquittal by the jury in a Child Sexual Exploitation Case in Oxford. The case involved 4 defendants... more
Kerim Fuad QC, Head of Chambers, leading Colin Witcher of Chambers Crime and Regulatory Group, today secured the unanimous... more
Yasin Patel will be addressing an International Audience in Hamilton, New Zealand at an International Sports Law Conference.... more
Lewis Power QC has been described by the Belfast International Homecoming Committee as “a World renowned barrister”.... more
The times reports on the ongoing trial, which both Lewis Power QC and Michael Polak have acted on, about the alleged gang rape of... more
Please see the following schedule regarding the opening times for Church Court Chambers through the month of December and... more
On the 4th December 2019, Church Court Chambers’ Michael Polak was elected as President of the Middle Temple Young... more
Glenn Harris represented a woman, a foreign national, who was charged with importing approximately £21 million of high purity... more
For even the most dyed in the wool Conservative voter, Conservative Central Headquarters’ decision to rename their twitter... more
A note from Islam Khan; new changes in the “Practice Statement” now give all tribunal caseworkers, working in... more